That cameras should be allowed in the courtroom essays

That cameras should be allowed in the courtroom essays Tradition. Precedent. Pomp and circumstance. These words come to mind when we consider the justice system. However, in many court facilities today the words "multimedia," "digital technology" and "state-of-the-art" just as easily apply. One must ask Do the words multimedia, digital technology and state-of-the-art relate to tradition, precedent, pomp, circumstance and the administration of justice. The answer ladies and gentlemen is no. We must not be fooled into the illusion of believing that cameras in the courtrooms will be beneficial to the justice system. Nor will it enable us the public to become better educated. Good evening chairperson ladies and gentlemen. As you have heard the topic for tonights debate is that we should have cameras in the courtrooms. We agree/disagree with the definition given by the opposition. Should both the moral and the practical. Cameras a device for taking photographs or motion pictures. Courtrooms a room where a law court is held. We should not have cameras in the courtrooms and we will continue to prove this to you. Tonight I will be speaking about, firstly, the use of cameras in the courtrooms as educators and how they mislead the public. Secondly, how cameras in the courtrooms are impractical. Our second speaker will continue by speaking, firstly, about the infringements cameras have on a citizens right to a fair trial and secondly, she will discuss cameras in the courtrooms in relation to entertainment purposes and the immoral form such broadcasting takes. I would now like to point out __ discrepancies in the oppositions case. My first argument tonight is that cameras in the courtrooms are not educators; they are often misleading and are the cause, not the solution, to the publics lack of confide ...